The crisis in Egypt has cast a glaring light on the entanglement of the German media landscape and the press with the parties working away in Berlin. That I do not even primarily from failure of ARD and ZDF in the crisis in Egypt . (Source Al Jazeera )
First, the issue as long as no blood is shed, the only way at the very edge among various Check. It was only a few days ago, which was in Tunisia, the first Arab dictator sent into the desert. And because many Egyptians immense gathering, and in a not legal but peaceful demonstration on Tharirplatz to demand reforms from a fossilized system. In this case the sheer volume of people has been an event not only for message but also for the history book. But when a grumpy breaker organizes his camp after the Haufenprizip unexpectedly dies, the yogis of ZDF equal to the OB van to be put. Although I to say nothing of principle against the pile, which is very effective. I like to use myself.
This is absolute total failure at this point to address this time probably finally fernsehkritik.tv , enough evidence that I have sent in any case by mail. my opinion have ARD and ZDF its mission to essential information necessary for policy development, so there they exist only as GEZ fees funded institutions, even at Stuttgart 21 so enormous missed that your settlement is no longer avoid . Now there is even such renowned magazines such as the FAZ have noticed that the colleagues think the right time have to fiddle.
I always avoid second-hand information, I can see for about 2 weeks only Al Jazeera English, which easily gets through satellite or the Internet. I have to say so exciting and tiring TV since July 1969 was no more.
In the few times when Egypt was something less busy, have the guys like any other news channel also, so her reports from the wound. And I came across something that I think that it is our future of decided importance. We can not afford not to take this issue to the attention of bars, But that's not a single report in the German Press and media world!
What's this? Located in the picturesque Himalayan Nepal is far us at least one point ahead. The country has 100% of what we call in our green power. After the matching party doctrine of the CDU, SPD and especially the Greens, we also supposed to be like that. If you look at the laws passed to bruising, so this increase in the accounts depends exclusively on the electrical work, regardless of performance and timing of the generation of electrical energy.
But this is fundamentally wrong, as pursued in an electric power generation and consumption always, for human conditions instantaneously, the same time needs. So if I as a green or green-influenced party to a 100% expansion of renewable, CO 2 set free Ernerigien, but unfortunately, always up to the warming from great depths, such that you can only harvest. This means you have to win the energy when the opportunity to do so, and then save it for a rainy day. And what about the so serious, it can, for example, weather conditions, also lead to crop failure, Here is the fog + wind in Nepal because of the different mix-El Nino drought.
the Nepal now have read so little water because of drought in their dams, and have to turn off the power . Forced break for approximately all jobs. Thieves can plan your break-ins without an alarm system stress very well, because the batteries are not back as soon as they are drawn from the power supply interruptions empty.
this is also an urgent warning that a nation that wants to economies with green electricity, a lot of control energy and also even have reserve energy resources. In short, something to be taken from our most urgent technically underexposed politicians of the allocation and the other hand, parties of the CDU-CSU-SPD-Green coalition in order need. And here's the result Google News search of a , as the German media landscape, the subject that is already some time at Al Jazeera identified, processed. And, even though pursued in these times every even marginally interested in politics man Al Jazeera, and the entire German media landscape, as quoted in the absence of its own infrastructure, Al Jazeerea. Thus there is only one overriding conclusion: The media landscape is hopelessly ussupiert of party interests.
Our European democracies are not so developed as democracies, but it was simply the only sovereign in human form of the king by the statistics of the opinion of all people replaced. But that requires work, the exchange and dissemination of arguments when it is also so important is the priority. If now dominate the public servants and party members that process, then it's as if the court officials her royal sovereign with opium or like stun, so that they can operate at will and whim. Party membership or ex Parteimitgleitschaften and employees in both public-funded media should be excluded!
0 comments:
Post a Comment