My call for the foundation of the United States of Arabia we witnessing today the birth pangs of the United States of Arabia?
The oldest form of large states is to shape the one to do this with violence. The merit of having made this first, you can probably Alexander
assign to the gutters. But no sooner was the dead potentate, his empire fell apart quickly and thoroughly.
The next great empire which the Romans
grew more slowly by some democratic structures and had therefore a longer service life. With the transition to the dictatorship of Caesar
but also its highest level was reached, was from then on it downhill now. Parallel to this was in the East China
as a large country, with the trials and tribulations because of its size exists even today. A dictatorship has the advantage that it can act decisively - but the disadvantage to take the same only the knowledge and experience of people in the leadership of the nation, provides a systematic disadvantage under dictatorships that go back leaves. This had to experience the Soviet Union
that fell apart, although they possessed as a state over an unassailable external integrity. No State or group could have you at risk from the outside, but inside the suboptimality compared to the other, it has Doomed.
The famine and political persecution in Europe brought many people to immigrate to America. The result was the first time in history, a community of people
, which have in common was that they were persecuted elsewhere. This resulted in a federal democracy, second to none. A securitized Constitution, which guarantees freedom of the individual and even maximized without the cohesion and the capacity would be lost as a state. By comparison, Europe is doing infinitely more difficult. After the second
World War was used the historic opportunity that has in many countries democracy found its way to a common Habitat to form. Currently, the EU
is something of a technical function community that is growing very very slowly together. The road to a Democratic state is still infinitely far. It begins with a common language. In the U.S., people have been able to agree on a vote by a common language. This works somehow not in the EU. I would vote for English, which seems to be personal, because Australia and North America and the handling to be the best choice. Instead, we have at the moment, there is increasing, 23 official languages. What a blast!
source Wikipedia
result is there is no common basis for democratic politics. How should I think about it, as an Irishman to choose, I simply do not understand him. I can not judge how he behaves in everyday life. How should I choose for him because as president. There are in the EU at only 1.5 international parties. Since not only
Socialist International . Its basic idea is that the living conditions of pure workers are the same everywhere, and so far the political interests were identical. But is that enough for much more than the singing of the Socialist International is not, so far only two selbige ups on the hump. The other party is on the Internet constituted
Pirate Party . The intense users of the Internet must speak English to get clear with your work unit, and for them, other cities and experience just a click away. So that they can claim to be the first global political party.
Now we compare the situation once the European Union with those of the nations in which
Arabic is spoken as official language. Arabic spread with Islam because the Quran is written in Arabic. So there are 250 million people who speak Arabic as their mother tongue, and once the 50 million it good command as a second language. What a gift the influence of God. Together, these men of incredible wealth. There are the oil resources in the past and present, and the vast resources of solar energy in the future. Add to this a natural feeling of togetherness and national population and is even supported by a broadly shared religion. What kind of ideal conditions for the "United States of Arabia." Such a state could prosper incredible. He was due to his size with ease militarily strong, did not need any attacks such as the criminal actions of the Vatican
fear and would be even a logical candidate for a permanent seat in a reformed UN Security Council
.
source Wikipedia
And what do the Arab leaders of it? Just bullshit! There are in Arabia is not a real working democracy. This was based on the one hand from the experience of world history that only a strong conquerors a great country, can form such as the Ottoman Empire
. This is logical, because with the merger of two dictatorships always arises the question of who is for now major new dictator. Only when this question by force or overthrow of one of the dead can be solved, it came in the past to a merger. The problem is that since Alexander the world has become much smaller. Since there is always somewhere in the world, people who think they are better placed with the current state, and the losing candidates to support in any white. Other democracies. If people can talk in a language, then offers a democratic state
with the basic principle of "one man one vote" is a neat solution to all political problems to solve.
How paltry compared to the Arab reality? In countries with large resources, the means for odd projects more or less thrown out the window. So they become the proverbial Palaces from 1001, it was so ever. Since artificial islands to be raised to attract people from other parts of the world in the dubious hope that they bring in the future, your money. Then these achievements, but also destroyed every now and then, in which one is at war. On the one against the neighbor, as is usual in Europe, too true, or against people who came from outside, and are perceived as intruders. And the countries that are blessed with resources so well? The need to earn, for example in the tourism business hard money. This is very difficult because you have to be very cheap to drain for a reasonable amount of people from other countries afford to be. Investment in good roads? In irrigation, or in education? near absence of ads, you need weapons to the other Arab states to hold at bay. The population must be bleeding, eventually even need a second-rate dictator adequate "service apartment" with enough gaudy luxury.
What else has suddenly become? The Internet is suddenly the opportunity to interact with people from other countries and to learn how this life. Even if sufficient financial means to visit them. The difference between what might be and what is for all to see - see enough people that a "we want a better government"
Falschmob threatens the chairs of the potentates.
This difference, between what is and what could be, that is the true Arab tragedy , and not, as would now believe turn power conservation reasons many politicians, have a few people settled in the Middle East on a few square kilometers because their ancestors there ages ago had their own state.
Read this article on
English, French
or
Arabic .