The idea that you can use for payments via mobile phones, is interesting at first glance. First, it could be that you can pay someone red tape, the one to help you on the phone with a problem, such as a computer hotline. Even in the so-called Apps, programs that run from smartphones, this form of payment is seen as practical.
The problem is that there are subjects with criminal energy. This will always find ways to create software so that they defrauded the owner of a terminal and simulates a contract without the owner will notice something like this.
There is no reason to assume that a premium rate content platforms through administrative means before Fraud must be protected. The show my experience with premium rate content advertising on my site Werbefinazierten. I have made this end of the 199x's, when a great many people went to the Internet via modem, and select smart sharks with so-called Dail, computer programs, the 0190 (now 0900) numbers, which receive money from the called party telecommunications companies. Only the massive proliferation of DSL, cable modems and other technologies for which no direct access to the purse of the surfer is available, could reduce the nuisance.
was the issue that was indeed regulated by the legislature, as the customer must be informed that they now spend extra money. The dialers had to be checked and filed with the Regulatory Authority for Post and Telecommunications. But these measures, the internet surfers do not really protect.
ran in my experience the rip-off Sun (1) A "Premium Line Provider" rented 0190 numbers from Deutsche Telekom AG or another company, which he accepted, of course, all terms and conditions and other statutory requirements to protect consumers. Then "offers premium web space" of this so-called providers where you could store content for which users must pay for access. Technically this was achieved by the call to the above, a very expensive programs, dialers number was. Part of the proceeds retained this technical service providers, the rest was in the "Premium Content Provider" is submitted.
(2) A "Premium Content Provider" is any, usually rather less excellent content that it still can usually find another gabT the internet free of charge, to the "Premium Web Space", say for example, grandmothers recipes. He is the electronic publisher. As such, it must, and must also advertise its services on the web. Since you never really know where that is the easiest way, one makes the most by auslobt people for customer referrals a share of the revenue. This eventually make other reputable suppliers such as E-Bay, Amazon & Co that way. Practical white, see the "Premium Web Space" is equal to the necessary hardware and software architecture, you need to measure what advertisers how much money to get. This architecture can also ensure that all parties accept the contractual provisions of the guidelines for handling the information requirements.
(3) bloggers and other people, the Ad-funded content and services offering sign on as advertisers, the Offered install advertising on your pages comply with the law, and it does nothing. € 0 sales. So it was with me, and I have the part a week later thrown from the server.
(4) After a while, with me it was a Six months suggests an interesting e-mail on the Web test grinding. Sender IP and email addresses come from somewhere between Singapore and Australia. Content of the e-mail for instructions on how to install the banner ads so that users do not with unnecessary information about costs discourage people from drinking the premium rate content can be held. The interesting thing is that my analysis will be distributed after a Dail, who chooses the "right number", then the money flee but not informed. Instead, on the hard disk of the correct, official dialers are installed, in the event of a dispute the validity of the contract was confirmed. The nasty, is the search for an invoice of course, only the official address of the website is found the so-called Backdoortrap is not.
(5) criminal law is the whole thing for all parties concerned for lack of evidence without any problems.
repeated Now the story of the apps on the smartphone probably. Again, it is probably not the operating systems of devices as safe to figures, which is a technical software theft is not possible. Finally, the former operating system manufacturer is again one of the party. In this respect I agree with the petition , is required by the telecommunications companies can be made about which links to third party which are billed automatically, must offer their customers an option that may be blocking this, these services, and new contracts, even this must be explicitly released to customers.
Technically this could be done for example so that you can explicitly enter the website of the telecommunications company, which services will release it. It must be protected by this application extremely well and should not be especially from the terminal here, to be retrieved from the performance, so that the pressure manipulation of the fraudsters can be kept away from consumers. It is important in my opinion, that the specific service, or at least the concrete supplier to use the one will, is explicitly made.
0 comments:
Post a Comment